THE PRIVATE INTERVIEW IN THE INITIAL INVESTIGATION. AN APPROACH TO THE INTERVENTION OF THE PARTIES IN THE FORMATION OF TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TESTIMONY
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 16, 2020
Keywords:
accusatory system, interrogatory, witness, impartial
Main Article Content
Abstract
In an accusatory system, the right to question or confront a witness is a minimal procedural guarantee. It is important that the information provided by the witness, through the private interview, is recovered in a careful and impartial manner.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
PLUMX Metrics
Article Details
How to Cite
Rábago Flores, G. (2020). THE PRIVATE INTERVIEW IN THE INITIAL INVESTIGATION. AN APPROACH TO THE INTERVENTION OF THE PARTIES IN THE FORMATION OF TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TESTIMONY. Iuris Tantum, 34(32), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.36105/iut.2020n32.04
Section
Monographic
Iuris Tantum is distributed under international Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author keeps the property rights with no restriction whatsoever and guarantees the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work. The author is free to deposit the published version in any other medium, such as an institutional archive or on his own website.
References
ABBUD, André de Albuquerque Cavalcanti Abbud, Cross Examination: Algunas
Questões, Revista de Abitragem e Mediação, 2017, vol. 52, enero-marzo,
pp.423-424
BRENSTEIN, Daniel M., y LOFTUS, Elizabeth, How to Tell if a Particular Memory
Is True or False, en Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2009, vol.
4, núm. 4, julio, pp. 370-374.
COADY, C.A.J, Testimony. A Philosophical Study, 1992, Oxford, Oxford University
Press.
DE PAULA RAMOS, Vitor, La Prueba Testifical, 2019, Traductor Laura Criado
Sánchez, Madrid, Marcial Pons, pp. 131-139.
MANZANERO, Antonio L., Memoria de Testigos. Obtención y Valoración de la
Prueba Testifical. Ediciones Pirámide, Madrid, 2019, p. 70.
MANZANERO, Antonio L.; PALOMO, R., “Dissociative amnesia beyond the
evidence about the functioning of memory”. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica,
2020, 30, 43-46. https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2019a14
ROVATTI, Pablo, “Testigos No Disponibles y Confrontación: Fundamentos Epistémicos
y No Epistémicos”, Questo Facti. Revista Internacional sobre Razonamiento
Probatorio, Número 1, 2020, Madrid, 2020, pp. 31-66.
SOTOCA, Andrés; MUÑOZ, José Manuel; GONZÁLEZ, José Luis y MANZANERO
Antonio L., “La prueba pre constituida en casos de abuso sexual infantil,
aportaciones desde la psicología jurídica”, Anuario de Psicología Jurídica,
2020, 30, 55-62. https://journals.copmadrid.org/apj
SALTHOUSE, T.A. The Processing-speed theory of adult differences in cognition.
Psychological Review, 1996, 103, 3, pp. 403-428.
SUSSMAN, A.L. Reality monitoring of performed and imagined interactive
events: developmental and contextual effects. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 2001, 79, 2, pp. 377-389.
WELLS G.L. y LOFTUS, E., Eyewitness testimony, Psychological Perspectives,
1991, Cambridge University Press.
Questões, Revista de Abitragem e Mediação, 2017, vol. 52, enero-marzo,
pp.423-424
BRENSTEIN, Daniel M., y LOFTUS, Elizabeth, How to Tell if a Particular Memory
Is True or False, en Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2009, vol.
4, núm. 4, julio, pp. 370-374.
COADY, C.A.J, Testimony. A Philosophical Study, 1992, Oxford, Oxford University
Press.
DE PAULA RAMOS, Vitor, La Prueba Testifical, 2019, Traductor Laura Criado
Sánchez, Madrid, Marcial Pons, pp. 131-139.
MANZANERO, Antonio L., Memoria de Testigos. Obtención y Valoración de la
Prueba Testifical. Ediciones Pirámide, Madrid, 2019, p. 70.
MANZANERO, Antonio L.; PALOMO, R., “Dissociative amnesia beyond the
evidence about the functioning of memory”. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica,
2020, 30, 43-46. https://doi.org/10.5093/apj2019a14
ROVATTI, Pablo, “Testigos No Disponibles y Confrontación: Fundamentos Epistémicos
y No Epistémicos”, Questo Facti. Revista Internacional sobre Razonamiento
Probatorio, Número 1, 2020, Madrid, 2020, pp. 31-66.
SOTOCA, Andrés; MUÑOZ, José Manuel; GONZÁLEZ, José Luis y MANZANERO
Antonio L., “La prueba pre constituida en casos de abuso sexual infantil,
aportaciones desde la psicología jurídica”, Anuario de Psicología Jurídica,
2020, 30, 55-62. https://journals.copmadrid.org/apj
SALTHOUSE, T.A. The Processing-speed theory of adult differences in cognition.
Psychological Review, 1996, 103, 3, pp. 403-428.
SUSSMAN, A.L. Reality monitoring of performed and imagined interactive
events: developmental and contextual effects. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 2001, 79, 2, pp. 377-389.
WELLS G.L. y LOFTUS, E., Eyewitness testimony, Psychological Perspectives,
1991, Cambridge University Press.